|
|
 |
|
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| 4.
FUEL-TO-STEAM EFFICIENCY |
 |
| This
is the ratio of BTU output divided by BTU input
on a particular boiler. This includes all the heat
loss (e.g. radiation and convection losses) from
a boiler and is typically used in a manufacturer's
catalouge. Fuel-to-steam efficiency is a readily
vertifiable number and is often used in efficiency
guarantees by various manufacturers. It is the ideal
"Fire-rate" efficiency which is tested
for about 10 minutes with a stack analyzer. Miura
does not think the above efficiencies explain "real-world"
efficiencies. Each boiler runs under different operating
condition such as load, operating time, radiation
heat losses from boiler physical surface area and
so on. |
 |
| 5.
IN-SERVICE EFFICIENCY |
 |
We
have developed a new definition of "IN-SERVICE
EFFICIENCY" to
describe these savings.
The
Definition is:
The resulting efficiency
of a boiler when the total operation cycles are
taken into account such as day, night, weekends,
high loads, low loads, standby loads. It is a comprehensive
efficiency which is based upon an operating model
and is the "bottom line" efficiency, which should
be used in any boiler comparison. It reflects how
well a particular boiler design handles a particular
operating model. |
|
 |
| The
basic difference between Fuel-to-Steam versus In-Service
efficiencies is that the Fuel-to-Steam efficiency is measured
at a fixed fire-rate and includes radiation and convection
losses; In-Service efficiency measures how well a particular
boiler design responds from bank firing (idling) to full
fire under a projected operating schedule. For example
a 100% fire rate - which includes convection and radiation
losses (fuel-to-steam) - the efficiency of a typical firetube
boiler for natural gas at an operating steam pressure
of 125 PSIG is about 81%. Drop the fire rate (due to convection
+ radiation losses) to 25% for the same boiler and the
efficiency becomes about 78.5%. Likewise an In-Service
efficiency of a boiler at 100% load, (meaning full fire
24 hours per day, 365 days per year) will be equal to
Fuel-to-Steam efficiency. However, drop the steam load
to 25%, (i.e. full fire for six hours and idling for 18
hours) and the In-Service efficiency will be much lower
than 78.5% efficiency. Idle the boiler to keep it warm
and ready to deliver steam upon demand and the In-Service
efficiency becomes zero. In-Service efficiency is the
most conservative approach to efficiencies and should
be considered in order to project what the bottom line
fuel consumption of a boiler should be. |
 |
| If we want to know
true fuel savings, it should be based on the In-service
efficiency because the above losses should be subtracted
from the Fuel-to-Steam efficiency. |
| |
|
|
 |
©
2006 Miura Boiler Co., Ltd.
Website by Digital Duck Inc. |
| |
|